What makes it a set “for Girls” exactly I wonder? I mean it’s not PINK like all girls-focused items so obviously should be, AMMARITE SISTAS?
Maybe she isn’t training to be a lab technician working with gross boy stuff like blood. There does seem to be a lot of colour in those test tubes. Formulating makeup to make herself look really pretty for boys? We all know that is hella important, AMMARITE SISTAS?
Ooh! Maybe she wants to work for that venerable institution known as The Ponds Institute. That’s GOT to be it. Glad I sorted that out.
Maybe one can make crystals. I was given a chemistry set for my 10th birthday. The major draw card ‘for girls’ was that you could make crystals.
Maybe its exactly the same as for boys but has “for Girls” on it so 1950s parents wont overlook it as a possible present for girls.
iwontallowit: (via whatdoyoucallthis)
The internet has its “outraged” face on over news that the Australian Classification Board plans to refuse classification to films depicting A-cup breasts in case it encourages pedophilia.
The story was kickstarted by a press release on Wednesday from the Australian Sex Party on the censorship of female ejaculation in film, which included the statement:
The Board has also started to ban depictions of small-breasted women in adult publications and films. This is in response to a campaign led by Kids Free 2 B Kids and promoted by Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett in Senate Estimates late last year. Mainstream companies such as Larry Flint’s Hustler produce some of the publications that have been banned. These companies are regulated by the FBI to ensure that only adult performers are featured in their publications. “We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size”, she said. “It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late”.
People really have the hugest capacity for stupidity. Between this and the idiocy being thrown at Delacroix, I’m not sure whether I want to laugh or punch someone.
Telling girls that real women have curves and that anyone who is attracted to small-breasted women is a paedophile is so ridiculous. Having small boobs does not make me a child. Feeling the need to insult the appearance of another person in order to make yourself feel better, however, is unbelievably childish.
And really, hearing about what another person is or is not attracted to is quite boring. The way we look and the things we like are two areas over which we have very little control. How we respond to those things is what really matters.
I was a small-breasted, thin waif of a woman (yes woman, not girl) for 5 years of my life. If I heard this was going on 2-7 years ago I would feel horrible/awful about myself. I am disgusted this has even become an issue.
I actually looked more like a “curvy, ‘ideal’ woman” when I was underage compared to how my body looked all the way through my early to mid 20s. I am sure that did not make any of my boyfriends or dates child stalkers.
Eh? Is it real? Is it really real?
The Tao of Steve, The Selvedge Yard